CO129-324 - Governor Nathan - 1904 [10-12] — Page 108

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Enclosure 1. (continued)

107

Manager wrote to the effect that Sheng Tao tai, Director-General of the Imperial Chinese Telegraph Administration, had replied that in the first place the line in question belonged to private individuals, and secondly that his Administration had received no instructions from the Chinese Government to terminate the line at the new frontier.

5.

The matter was then allowed to drop till last year when Sir Henry Blake directed that the Chinese Authorities should be addressed on the subject of the removal to the frontier of the terminal station of the Chinese Telegraph Line. A letter was accordingly written to His Majesty's Consul-General at Shanghai who was asked to notify the Director-General of the Imperial Chinese Telegraph Administration that the removal should be effected within a period of 6 months.

6.

In reply to a communication from Sir Pelham Warren in that sense the Director-General of Telegraphs wrote a letter (see enclosure 1) in which he claimed that the Telegraph Station being situated in the New Territories and not in Hongkong was in the same category as the Telegraph Lines in Shanghai, Weihai, and other places, and explained that although the Chinese Telegraphs are controlled by Officials, the Chinese Government permits private individuals to hold shares in the undertaking and that therefore the lines are the property of private individuals. The Director-General begged that the Telegraph House and Lines might therefore be allowed to remain in the leased Territory.

7.

Edit History

2026-06-01 20:56:54 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Enclosure 1. (continued) 107 Manager wrote to the effect that Sheng Tao tai, Director-General of the Imperial Chinese Telegraph Administration, had replied that in the first place the line in question belonged to private individuals, and secondly that his Administration had received no instructions from the Chinese Government to terminate the line at the new frontier. 5. The matter was then allowed to drop till last year when Sir Henry Blake directed that the Chinese Authorities should be addressed on the subject of the removal to the frontier of the terminal station of the Chinese Telegraph Line. A letter was accordingly written to His Majesty's Consul-General at Shanghai who was asked to notify the Director-General of the Imperial Chinese Telegraph Administration that the removal should be effected within a period of 6 months. 6. In reply to a communication from Sir Pelham Warren in that sense the Director-General of Telegraphs wrote a letter (see enclosure 1) in which he claimed that the Telegraph Station being situated in the New Territories and not in Hongkong was in the same category as the Telegraph Lines in Shanghai, Weihai, and other places, and explained that although the Chinese Telegraphs are controlled by Officials, the Chinese Government permits private individuals to hold shares in the undertaking and that therefore the lines are the property of private individuals. The Director-General begged that the Telegraph House and Lines might therefore be allowed to remain in the leased Territory. 7.
Baseline (Original)
Enclosure 1. (tendated) 107 Manager wrote to the effect that Sheng Tao tai, Director-General of the Imperial Chinese Telegraph Administration, had replied that in the first place the line in question belonged to private individuals, and secondly that his Administration had received no instructions from the Chinese Government to termi- nate the line at the new frontier. 5. The matter was then allowed to drop till last year when Sir Henry Blake directed that the Chinese Autho- rities should be addressed on the subject of the removal to the frontier of the terminal station of the Chinese Telegraph Line. A letter was accordingly written to His Majesty's Consul-General at Shanghai who was asked to notify the Director-General of the Imperial Chinese Telegraph Adminis- tration that the removal should be effected within a period of 6 months. 6. In reply to a communication from Sir Pel- ham Warren in that sense the Director-General of Telegraphs wrote a letter (see enclosure 1) in which he claimed that the Telegraph Station being situated in the New Territories and -444 not in Hongkong was in the same category as the Telegraph Lines in Shanghai, Weihai, and other places, and explained that although the Chinese Telegraphs are controlled by Officials, the Chinese Goverment permits private individuals to hold shares in the undertaking and that therefore the lines are the property of private individuals. The Director-General begged that the Telegraph House and Lines might therefore be allowed to re- main in the leased Territory. 7.
2026-06-01 20:56:54 · Baseline
View content

Enclosure 1. (tendated)

107

Manager wrote to the effect that Sheng Tao tai, Director-General

of the Imperial Chinese Telegraph Administration, had replied

that in the first place the line in question belonged to

private individuals, and secondly that his Administration had

received no instructions from the Chinese Government to termi-

nate the line at the new frontier.

5.

The matter was then allowed to drop till

last year when Sir Henry Blake directed that the Chinese Autho-

rities should be addressed on the subject of the removal to

the frontier of the terminal station of the Chinese Telegraph

Line.

A letter was accordingly written to His

Majesty's Consul-General at Shanghai who was asked to notify

the Director-General of the Imperial Chinese Telegraph Adminis-

tration that the removal should be effected within a period

of 6 months.

6.

In reply to a communication from Sir Pel-

ham Warren in that sense the Director-General of Telegraphs

wrote a letter (see enclosure 1) in which he claimed that the

Telegraph Station being situated in the New Territories and

-444

not in Hongkong was in the same category as the Telegraph Lines

in Shanghai, Weihai, and other places, and explained that

although the Chinese Telegraphs are controlled by Officials,

the Chinese Goverment permits private individuals to hold

shares in the undertaking and that therefore the lines are

the property of private individuals.

The Director-General begged that the

Telegraph House and Lines might therefore be allowed to re-

main in the leased Territory.

7.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.